I watch little, very little TV and, when I see it, I usually put TV3, where the program is broadcast Poland, a satire and humor program in which actors imitate Catalan and Spanish politicians to mock the current political situation.
In the last program I could see the same Eduard Estivill explaining his method in a gag of the program, probably to take advantage of the pull of the program and make yourself known even more if possible.
The problem (for him) is that what tries to be a comic situation (which it is, because it is still a humorous show) ends up serving as an analogy for viewers: in Poland we see that the Estivill method is used to placate the masses, to give them one of lime and one of sand and ignore their logical and legitimate revindications, more or less the same thing that happens when a child cries for his parents to attend to him.
Your scientific method
It is curious to see that he says his method has been scientifically tested in babies, but not in adults. It is logical, what nonsense should be to try to make a teenager or an adult sleep well, ignoring him, basically because he doesn't care. However, children do not care and that is why it works, because they are afraid, because they do not receive what they need, because they are stressed and finally stop calling, knowing that no one will come to offer the accompaniment they need.
The point of the matter is that he talks about science, when we have been commenting that abuse (ignoring a baby would not be the worst form of abuse, I think, but a form of abuse) is harmful to children because their brains are They are alert to prevent threats and make them live in fear, that only two minutes ignoring a baby are enough for them to be stressed and enough for them to stress again only with the expectation that something like this will happen again and that the baby's brain He is so immature that they are not able to reason why they must, with six months, be able to sleep alone.
I don't know what science you mean, exactly, but I I prefer to be guided by science that says that people need love and company (I think everyone prefers loneliness) and the one that says that Babies are the ones who know best what they need (and contact with their parents is one of the things they need most).
If we have to let a baby cry for two, three and four minutes it is a sign that we have to force a situation to the point that someone who does not know the baby or is present at that moment marks us and until the baby finally Shut up (in the video they leave). If we have to force a situation the children have a bad time and many parents too. And forcing, forcing, sometimes things break ...
Have the video unionists accepted the cuts?
Well, that, raise your hand who believes that trade unionists are gone because they have realized that the cuts are the best for them ... No one? True. They will have left tiredly, tired of their president offering, instead of words, a stuffed animal called Pepito, which is useless.
Something similar happens with babies. Not that they learn to sleep peacefully. It's not that they decide that their parents do it for their own good, it's that they realize that when they ask for love, love, contact and security, they receive loving words from dad and mom and A stuffed animal, which is cold, is neither a mom nor a dad and "does not understand me."
And Rajoy Colecha ...
At the end of the video we realize that Rajoy Colecha with the trade unionists. Surprisingly, doing so, he has avoided general strikes. It is important to think and, above all, it is important to think about Estivill's role in this video. It gives me the feeling that he wants to advertise himself, because on TV3 he is a reputed and well-known person, but that the shot ends up coming out of the butt ...
